The movie “A Beautiful Mind” Essay

The movie is titled A Beautiful Mind and the mental disorder that is depicted in it is schizophrenia. In the movie, the main character is jolly Nash is depicted as being schizoid in the following ways. In one instance, he is revealed as being able to hear voices that other people could not hear. This voices are seen as controlling agents of the actions he does. The voices in the movie control his thoughts and to some extend seem like they regard to harm him. His behavior is placidity terrifying to the people around Nash.The portrayal of psychological disorder of schizophrenia is a true picture of the figure as it occurs in real life. Another symptom of the disorder that was unequivocal in the movie is the fact the sitting for several hours without any travail or speech. Nash had bout where he could not move or intercommunicate for a lot of hours. This is the typical behavior of schizophrenic people. He seemed exquisite most of the time but as soon as he made a revelation of what was on his mind people were take aback on what was going on in his mind. The portrayal of an individual with schizophrenic disorder in the movie A Beautiful Mind was hence a realistic portrayal of the disorder CITATION Bus03 l 1033 ( snog & Buss, 2003).My reaction after viewing the movie is that schizophrenia is a psychological disorder that affects families and societies in general. The people who are diagnosed with this condition find it quiet difficult to live a normal life as they cuss so much on other people to help them in their daily activities. The only solution to it is by coping with the symptoms of the disease.ReferencesBIBLIOGRAPHY Buss, E. H., & Buss, A. H. (2003). Schizophrenia 7 Approaches. Transaction Publishers.Source document

Representation of Women in the Action Film Genre – Marion Ravenwood + Lara Croft

In this essay, I will be looking at the means of women in the action bourgeon genre and study the social messages that ar constructed and conveyed by the media. The two media texts I will be comparing from be The robbers of the unconnected Ark and Tomb Raider. The female lead in Raiders of the Lost Ark is Marion Ravenwood who is played by Karen Allen and the male lead Harrison Ford plays Indiana Jones. In Tomb Raider Angelina Jolie plays the female lead, Lara Croft. Marion Ravenwood is seen as a typical action heroine.In Raiders of the Lost Ark, Marion unveils divers(prenominal) graphic symbolistics about herself for shell Marion tends to be quite feisty. She displays this in the beginning, when we see Indy move into her bar. Acknowledging that they had a past and that Indy left her, instead of being quiet, she goes and slaps him. Another stroke is when shes trying to passing water after shes been kidnapped and this opens another estimate that she does not give up. This suggests that women, however stereotypically gentle and calm, rump be zestful.However courageous, Marion in addition has her female traits. For example, when shes in the Well of Souls and there are suicidal creatures lurking at each angle, she screams and complains. This different portrayal of Marion suggests that she as well as being tough, she can also be a female whos frightened and needs a composition (Indiana Jones) in this case to foster her. She is smart and uses whatever she can find, for example the frying pan, to protect herself and her man with.But at the same time, shes also always acquiring into spat because of her zesty self, for example when she refuses to give the gold medallion to the Nazis and nearly getting killed. Lara Croft is seen much as an unconventional action heroine. In Tomb Raider, Lara plays a British Aristocrat and is seen as a woman who likes to live on the edge and can seem as a quite stonehearted woman as she is rattling focused in what she does. The fact that she does martial humanistic discipline propose of Lara Croft to be of a manly character by carrying and applying traits that are generally used by successful.When Laras butler tries to get her to dictate on a dress, she drops her towel to reveal herself, which portrays her a sexual character. I believe that the media wants to convey that women can be seen equal to men and although normally underestimated, they can do a lot more than men can. On the other hand, Lara also is very turned on(p) and we see that this is a owing(p) weakness of her, which is used against her. Lara is emotionally unstable by her fathers death and tries to take a big risk in guild to fulfill her desire of meeting him once more. We see this when Mr.Powell emotionally blackmails her and offers her By this, we can see that Lara has a very emotional aspect in her, which is mostly seen as a womanly trait is the strongest and only issue which is stopping her to become a man. Lara can be s een as a positive character in the fact that shes self dependent and successful in it, which Marion doesnt prove to be. Looking at Marion Ravenwood and Lara Croft, we can see that there have been some major changes in the facsimile of Women in the Action Film Genre. In both films, the female character is portrayed in a different way.For example, Raiders of The Lost Ark which is a film that was set in the 1936s showed Marion as a side heroine who was dependent on the Male Lead. On the other hand, Tomb Raider which is much more modern movie depicted Lara to be the main star and was self-sufficing and even though had a past, didnt necessarily need a man. As a common stereotype created for them, females were shown as smart but by using their brains Marion, for example when trying to get Belloq drunk so that she could escape while hed gone unconscious.In modern times, however women are also shown to be using their physicality and brainpower Lara Croft could be used as an example as she was known to figure out the correct area to mail the triangle and defeated the creatures that came her way. egg-producing(prenominal) leads were much more believable approve then as they mostly stuck to the stereotype built for them, however Female leads now are not as believable as they slip more male stereotypical characteristics, one of them being physical strength.This As times have changed so have womens usages in society, and accordingly their representation in the media. The representation of women has improved as they have moved ship into a more equal society. Hollywood is a reflection of square life, and the point that the representation has improved because of society views, making it easier for the audience to bushel in general, has proved this. Also, if an Action film has a male lead, chances are that the majority would be male audience as women are mostly not interested.But if an Action film has a female lead, theres more happening of both gender audiences, as it would contain a bit of emotional drama that women would enjoy and the female lead would have to be attractive, challenge to the male gaze. This shows that Hollywood imitates what has been going on in the natural world. In conclusion, I believe that women in action films are positive role models if were looking only at Marion and Lara. Marion and Lara are both very different placed because of the timings

Uniforms vs No Uniforms

Students at schools with implement work enactments stomach better than students at schools with kayoed go for fructify codes. They endure to be more than educated, invite more discipline, and befool better manners than those students without enforced determine codes. Students with enforced hook codes tend to be more educated than those students who go to schools without enforced snip codes because they tend to interpret school more. According to research, students that have uniforms have better attendance because they dont have to worry about what they be wear outing to school because e precise(prenominal) hotshot is wearing the same style of clothing.No one is there to criticize them about how their shirt is ugly or how their berth dont match what theyre wearing. One of the reasons why students dont go to school is because they dont have the discipline uniform to hold up in or be cool and they dont trust to get bullied by the cool kids. An other(a) reason why students with enforced deck codes atomic number 18 more educated is because since everyone is wearing the same thing, they arent disquieted about who is wearing what. Since they dont have that on their minds, they have more eon to worry about their education and pay more attention in class. Many students like to gossip about what others are wearing.It may be in a positive way or in a negative way. But either way, the have their minds occupied on something other than their classwork. Students who go to a school with enforced dress code are more likely to focus on their education because they are way out to school to learn, not to worry about who is wearing the latest clothes trend. Students tend to be more disciplined if they attend schools that enforce dress codes because they have more order at their school. These students are ordered to deliver the goods a certain dress code and it is up to them if they want to enjoy authority or not.Those who choose to listen and go to schools with enforced dress codes are obviously more disciplined than those who dont go to dress code enforced schools. These students dont re onlyy get into fights or talk back to their teachers. These students tend to be more deferential to teachers and students because they are willing to follow tout ensemble of the schools rules. They listen to teachers and set good examples. It is said that kids are better behaved when they are dressed neatly and modestly. Students that attend dress code enforced schools have more manners and class than those students that dont go to dress code enforced schools.The reason why these students have more class is because they know how to dress respectively. They dont go around town in shorts or underdrawers that hang below their underpants. They arent the type of people that wear chest telltale(a) shirts. These students are very respectful and show a lot of class. Schools that enforce dress codes tend to have someer fights occur on their campu s. Their students are better behaved and have more manners than students that go to a school where they dont enforce dress codes. According to research, a lot of fights start out because a student made fun of another students clothes.Well, if schools were stricter on what students were allowed to wear and maybe make the students wear uniforms, these fight would never occur. There was a boy named greyback who was very smart. He never got anything lower than a A in any of his classes. He was also very gymnastic and enjoyed playing sports. You would think that everything was going well for him except for the fact that Johnny had no friends. You see, the kids at school didnt want to be friends with him because of the way he dressed. His parents couldnt afford to buy him clothes that were in so he didnt fit in with the cool kids.The kids at school were too embarrassed to be seen talking to Johnny, so they clean avoided him. Johnny was always getting picked on. The kids at school woul d often call him names and drop his books in the dormitory to seem cool and fit in with the other kids who were doing it. Even though Johnny was very athletic, he was always the last one to be picked when playing a sport. Johnny became very lonely and depressed because as a kid, he never had any friends. He started slacking in school, no longer getting As. He began to get Cs and Ds with a few occasional Fs.He began to skip classes so that he wouldnt have to go through the whole bullying situation. He stopped playing sports for they just didnt bring him much joy anymore. One day when Johnny was at the mall, he saw the pair of Levis that everyone was wearing to school on a mannequin in a hive away window. He went in the store and tried them on. He love the way that he looked in them and legal opinion that if he wore them to school, some of the kids would think that he was cool and possibly be friends with him. But when he flipped over the price tag and saw that the jeans make up $ 39. 9, his hopes went down. He could never afford to buy forty dollar jeans. whence an idea came to mind. He thought that if he stole the jeans without anyone noticing, then he could have them without paying for them.So Johnny walked out of the store with the jeans on hoping that no one would notice. Unfortunately, Johnny got caught. Security called his parents in and Johnny got scolded by security. They told him the consequences of stealing and how he could end up in jail. When his parents got there, they asked Johnny why he stole the pants and he told them the truth.When they realized what was going on, they transferred him to a school where the kids had to wear uniforms. Johnny realized how great his new peers were and loved the fact that no one was making fun of him because of his style of clothing. At the new school, Johnny became his usual self again, getting straight As and playing sports. The only difference was that he now had a lot of friends. Therefore, students who atte nd schools that enforce dress codes are better behaved than students who go to schools that dont enforce dress codes.These students dress better, have better manners, and they show a lot of discipline. opposed students who attend schools that dont enforce dress codes who have no discipline what-so-ever and who dress like they dont even care that they are going to school. Overall, education is very important and should be taken very seriously. Students should behave and be respectful to all peers and teachers. If students tend to behave better with enforced dress codes, than all schools should enforce dress codes. After all, how we dress does matter and it affects our performance very much.

Conservatism Is Merely A Ruling Class Ideology

Conservatism has three strands Traditional, New Right and ring armor New right conservatism. It serves in the pursual of the rich and motiveful and it serves in the interest of every hearty coterie, including the poor. Marxists in particular would argue that conservatism is a class based ideology. They would as well argue that ideologies reflect the interest of a particular class. Burke was a traditional conservative and he believed in the original state. Traditional conservatives atomic number 18 motivated by the organic state they believe that the nightclub is a living entity, rather than a mechanism.They consider society as a pyramid and command structure, which serves in the interest of the rich because society is fixed and the rich provide endlessly be at the top. society can never have companionable equality because of hierarchy. They do non believe in meritocracy and individualism, they believe that society is more important than the individual, therefore they b elieve in collectivism. People may believe that the ideology is good but in reality it is non because people do non have rights they have duties and conservatives only make do equality of status.Socialists believe in economic equality, this is the only equality that does not go for people down. Conservatism was reaction against Liberalism (French revolution). Burke was against the French revolution. Disraeli was also motivated by class interest. He introduced One-nation conservatism, which was about keeping complaisant cohesion betwixt the rich and the poor. Disraeli gave the vote to the urban working class male because if he did not the Liberals would have done so. Burke at one time said that he the palace is not safe when the cottage is not happy meaning that the rich are not happy when the poor are not satisfied.If the poor is not satisfied then there provide not be social stability, because there bequeath be a revolution. Burke introduced social reforms to stop a revol ution. Randolph Churchill formulated Tory democracy which stated that in order to gain the support of the working-class they have to develop the conglomerate by making them believe in it. They did not want to do too much for the poor, but rather to help them enough to keep them happy. Conservatives voted against the NHS, which was brought in by Labour, because it is a ruling class ideology.They only dogged to accept the NHS because they are pragmatic and they did not believe in nationalized industries because it took power a office for the poor. They believed in the mixed economy. They disliked nationalization and wanted to privatize most nationalized businesses. They introduced the minimum wage and it was popular and a vote break throughner. In 1979, Thatcher became Prime Minister and she also served the interest of the rich. She privatized industries such as British telecom, British railways.Liberal New right believed in and rolling pole the state, hence the belief in laissez -faire economics. They believed in the non-interventionist state, that the state will not intervene in the economy to help the poor. For example the employment of Orgreaves, the miners strike the government re amalgamated to subsidize what they called the uneconomic picks. Thatcher setup grant hold nurtures which got more money. Schools were a two tier system and the better-off benefited from this. This basically suggests that Thatcher reeks of the rich. decree was more differential because people had more respect. Disraeli introduced one-nation conservatism, and he was genuinely have-to doe with about the poor, evidenced in his quote, there is a gap between the rich and the poor and his Crystal Palace speech. Disraeli detested capitalism because it creates inequality and exploits workers. He did what he had to do to stop a revolution, the invention of One-nation. Burke believed in the organic state and this was not just about the rich and the poor, as a traditional conservative he believed that everyone should be valued equally.The satisfying of the ideology was paternalistic meaning that conservatism like a buzz off anxietys for the people, not just in the interest of the rich. This is confirmed in the quote, Society is a partnership between it suggests that we are all valuable. All traditional conservatives believe in social reforms because of the rule of One-nation. In Harold Macmillans Middle Way (1938), he advocates the mixed economy. After the WWII, they realized that there was a new way to help the poor by accepting the welfare state, they also real Keynesianism by reflate the economy.Conservatives were very Keynes on grammar school, after all Thatcher went to a Grammar school. As Liberal New right Thatcher believed I meritocracy, individualism and embourgeoisement. individuality means you can make it and meritocracy means that you can make it on merit. For example, selling councils houses tainting it means that it is now our property, owned democracy. People could buy shares, share owning democracy, not just the rich and the powerful, but also the poor. Post-New right, neo-liberal leaders Hague, Smith, Major, Howard and Cameron, all have business interest.Cameron has adopted and fused neo-liberalism with elements of One-nation. Cameron believes in social responsibility. This means that society has to work together to look after and care for each other, however if we care for each other the government will not help us. For example Jamie Oliver it was not the government that improved school dinners. Social responsibility is a way of saying rolling foul the state, Cameron uses One-nation rhetoric, though he still wants a smaller state, he does not want to regulate the state.He wants to take politicians out of the NHS. He fused neo-liberal elements and one-nation because he cares about the economy, example targeting families who have to move over child-minders instead they pay money to family relatives to look after you r children. This is One-nation because keeps social cohesion. In 1979, the working-class voted Thatcher in because in 1983, the Conservatives promised that people could buy council houses and Labour said they would nationalize the banks. Thatcher would win because she had taken on the Falklands war and found victory.

Rhetorical Analysis: Proclamation of Rebellion

Proclamation of Rebellion On August 23rd of 1775, queen regnant George tierce issued A Proclamation for Suppressing Rebellion and Sedition after hearing discussion of the battle of Bunker Hill. The docu manpowert declared that the colonies were in an open press out of rebellion and requested that all subjects of Great Britain report traitorous proportionateness by anyone who may be involved so they could be punished. mightiness Georges proclamation acted as an antithesis and undermined his remaining compound moderate support.The affair of the proclamation was obvious queer George III wanted to thwart the colonial rebellion by coercing them by means of intimidation, which is a form of an ethos appeal. However, the clock of the issuance of the proclamation and its diction reveal a seemingly dire King George. King George III opened the proclamation with the use of a self-sealing conspiracy controversy against the leaders of the rebellion when he referred to them as ill desig ning. He tried to create an outlet for the average colonial subject by calling them misled. This also played into the conspiracy argument by making those same subjects doubt the American leadership they had followed up to that point. It seems as though he called the colonists to rethink their position by limning Great Britain as their protector and guardian while labeling the colonial leadership as avaricious conspirators. These claims that Britain was still an excellent father figure to whom the colonists owed wonder and deference were arguments of principle.However, it was clear that legion(predicate) colonists found incidences such as The capital of Massachusetts Massacre and The Battle of Bunker Hill indicated otherwise. Not only did The Battle of Bunker Hill display that Great Britain was non the colonists protector, but also that the British could be beaten. This loss painted a much weaker picture of King George. The proclamation was released just before King George woul d decline to receive the colonists Olive Branch Petition.By declining to receive the petition, it was assumed that the Kings proclamation was his response. With that in mind, the remaining colonial moderates retained secondary hope that Great Britain and the colonies would remain united. King Georges proclamation label the leaders of the colonial resistance dangerous and ill designing men and listed the ship canal they had violated royal law. He also posited all the ways the Empire had correctly administered governance and rule over the colonies.It said that those who assist Britain in finding conspirators would be protected for their loyalty and zeal and that ignorance was not an option. Up to this point, ignorance of the relations between the colonies and Britain was the path chosen by many moderates who hoped reconciliation would be made. In his proclamation King George identified these moderates as well as Tory supporters and attempted to pit them against the conspirators. T his rhetorical act on the part of King George III and the British was an utter failure at achieving its intended goal.By that point, the relationship between the two parties had been violent for quite slightly time and colonial confidence in the King by his shrink supporting minority was waning. He used self-boasting ethos appeals to the colonists (many of whom had already come to the finding that they didnt like him) and hoped that they would essentially turn themselves in and give up. The chastise part about the entire proclamation was that it completely crushed moderates who back up the idea that independence wasnt the answer.

History in America Essay

Domestic villainy has a long and denigrating write up in America. Gener in completelyy it occurs when the valet indoors the family seeks to maintain or urinate turn back oer his married woman or love 1 by means of a variety of motives which in the end, be counterproductive and which normally push the distance between the dupe and the culprit which had already existed in the stock and which contri howevered to the start of the clapperclaw.What is starting to gain round light in upstart stratums is the fact that custody some measure jakes be the dupes of indicate ally misapply, both from homo inner and heterosexual copulationships and which endure be truly damaging to the relationship in both cases. Abuse nooky be divided into carnal, wound up, economic and religious. (Cook, 2003 pg. 13) All four fecal matter and a lot measure do, place irr ever sosible damage on the victim which if they be to ever recover from the abuse, advise a great deal me asure dispenses years and some clock decades to recover.Others allow never fully recover and in carrying that transgress, such(prenominal) abuse serves as a severe impediment to the victim ever carrying out favored and versed relationships with future idiosyncratics. This is how sexual supply abuse peck be so destructive. A b deficiency eye pull up s induces completely be cured _or_ healed in the matter of a couple of weeks at the most. However, a bruised mentality and emotional hurt can lots quantify linger when on that rate seems to be no outside set up on the victim.Only when that victim engages in a intimate relationship with an outside party bequeath such hurt often times come to the surface and can sometimes completely negate the ability of the couple to continue in a successful and loving relationship as the victim whitethorn be forever scarred as a resoluteness of the foregoing abuse. Further on a lower floorstanding of the manages of house servant fi erceness and the ways in which it can be dealt with and even prevented is so genuinely important to non completely the victim and his or her loved mavin and just(a)s, unless in addition their future relationships and also, the perpetrator himself.In doing this, the individual can better identify the reasons why he acts out in such a fashion and in doing so, it becomes that a lot more likely for the motivation to be identified and so correct in integrity way or an different. In the end, domestic vehemence can take on m each forms and each case of intimate married some wizard abuse can be the result of a unity motivating factor or the combination of diverse factors and all to variable degrees.Domestic violence go away not be vaporiseing eithertime currently from our parliamentary procedure but in the cognizance of the social movements and prevailing and damaging effectuate of such abuse, ace may be better educated and alert to identify it and stop it from e ver occurring. In stolon set abouting to understand family violence, unrivaled essential first define it. There are four study categories which are to be involved when talking about family violence and the dangers that it imposes on the victims involved. The first and most diaphanous is somatogenetic violence.This constitutes unwanted physical tinct which can also include rape and murder. It can also include in compute physical violence as for lawsuit, the throwing of objects from atomic number 53 mortal or another with the intent of committing injury on the receiver of the object. The second major fellowship of family violence is mental or emotional violence. This constitutes verbal threats of physical violence to the victim, his or her electric shaverren, animals or the use of possessions of all kind.Verbal threats also do not have an exact time frame associated to it as the threat of physical violence can be impending or is relegated to some inexact time in the f uture. Facial expressions or intemperate body postures can also constitute an example of emotional or mental violence. The third is economic or social abuse. This is where one component of the family controls the others money in such a stiff nose out that the victim is under strict economic dependence upon the perpetrator to a degree that a sense of em force playment is concluded and usually is the chief motivating factor.Social abuse is when the social life of the victim is dependent completely upon the perpetrator as he or she dictates who, the victim leave behind see and how often. The victim usually suffers from a decrease in the number of friends in comparison to the time when the victim was not under the control of the perpetrator. Lastly, the fourth most common form of family violence or abuse is spiritual abuse. This is the saloon of the victims spiritual confidence to be practiced in the home.This can also constitute a repeated harassment of the victims faith and so meoneal beliefs to the point of ridicule. This also takes a toll on the victim but is one that has not received the same amount of coverage from violence prevention groups and in that locationfore, there is less k at one timen as the repetitive of the violence as good as its direct effects upon the victim. All forms of family violence is harmful to the individual but the one that is the most common as tumefy as the most dangerous is physical violence within the home. very(prenominal) much times, this relates to sexual violence. Sexual violence is defined as the use of physical force to compel an individual to participate in a sexual act which is against the get out of both pot involved. (Cook, 2003 pg. 23) When one of the participating parties is pressure into the sexual act, this is an example of sexual violence. Also, the sexual advances upon somebody who is un exiting to abandon the advances, whether that be a result of the victim being intoxicated or his or her mental o r physical disability preventing the victim from refusing.This is an example of sexual violence as well. It is a tragical fact but one that is well established despite mens waver to report as being victims of both sexual and physical abuse by their partners, it is much more common for men to be the perpetrators than women. atomic number 53 of the impediments to achieving an exact study on this fuss is the fact that more men will not report such cases to the guard out of timidity of superfluity as well as the police or their loved ones from taking the incident seriously.It is estimated that as legion(predicate) as 70% of all abuses of women towards men goes unreported. (Cook, 2003 pg. 118) This reluctance speaks to the misunderstanding of society as to the importance that the recognition of female abuse towards men. Mental and emotional violence which has a direct and prohibit effect upon the psychological make up of the individual is one of the four main categories of fam ily violence. One aspect of this is when a threat is make from one person to another which promises bodily harm in the conterminous future as well as an indeterminate time in the future.However, this is only one aspect of the psychological violence which occurs most often within the home. Harmful and repeated words of aggression or an attempt to bring down the family member with repeal hostile words or gestures in an attempt to maintain the supposed authority of one individual over another. A threat of a physical injury only constitutes a percentage of the abuse which can fall under the category of psychological abuse.This abuse is basi birdsongy any intentional verbal entrancement which is designed to maintain the believed authority of one person over another. When it is perceived that the victim is slipping away from the authority of his or her perpetrator, the abuse will often times intensify. (Jones 2001 pg. 14) This feeling of a loss of role will only increase the abuse so when a victim feels as though the abuse will stop or is coming to a stop, often times, it is simply the calm before the storm as a more intensified version of the abuse is to presently follow.Psychological abuse can also use the children as weapons as the leavens are want a divorce and the gyves of the children is at stake. One parent will use the child to alienate the parent and to make the other feel as though he or she is powerless in their childs life and that the authority, influence and love which the parent has present in the childs life, is no longer valid and will soon be completely erased. These are very powerful feelings which often times can evoke a powerful response.In a very sad case in Hazel Crest, Illinois, a suburb of loot in the fall of 2006, John Jacobs, a forty one year nonagenarian man in the middle of a bitter custody battle with his wife over his only child, an eight year gaga girl, the man, an avid pilot, piloted his plane along with his daughter ins ide and purposely, flew his plane into his ex wifes house, killing both him and his eight year old daughter. The mother was not home at the time of the incident.The suicide maintain that the man left for his friends, and the testimony of those who knew the family was able to substantiate his story that his wife was daily threatening him with their daughter and the possibility that she would never see her pay back again. Before killing both himself and his only daughter, Mr. Jacobs stated in his change note Julie, ( his wife) you have through with(p) every(prenominal)thing in your power to try to take my daughter away from me.That is not right and I feel compelled to do the only thing that I have any power over. For your efforts, I will now take the daughter away from you forever. (Pearson, 2003 pg. C3) This of course, was not a justified reaction to the parental alimentation which the mother reportedly employ as a weapon against his ex husband. Hurt feelings were at a premium and when the child is used as a weapon, parents often times, do not possess all of their rational faculties.This was one very sad and tragic example of what can happen when the emotional abuse of one person over another reaches its zenith and the victim will often times become the aggressor in response as he or she feels completely helpless by the abuse and now seeks to eliminate the opening night in power between the victim and the perpetrator which had existed. (Roberts 2002 pg. 114) Often times in such cases, the courts are dragged in to take sides and in the process, usually will contribute the parental alienation as well.Economic abuse is when one person, usually a spouse, has complete control over the finance of the family and over the other person. This goes beyond the responsible actions of one who seeks to place his or her family on a budget and adheres to the strict restrictions himself, as well as what he imposes upon the other members of the family. Economic abuse oc curs when there is an unnecessary and very fiscally stringent limitations placed upon the others spending habits temporary hookup at the same time, not following the advice of his own actions.This is designed, not for the interest of fiscal responsibility but in order to create a dominion over the other in the form of financial power. If one does not have the economic freedom to act in conformity with his or her own financial earning power, indeed the person who controls that money, also controls the person who earns it. When one speaks of family violence and abuse, economic abuse often times is forgotten as physical abuse monopolizes the conversation. However, over time, economic abuse can be just as effective in the pursuit of one person to create or maintain control over another.This is dependable because at the center of all abuse, whether it be physical, emotional or economic, there exists the desire of one person to create or maintain their control over another person (Ro berts 2002 pg. 200) Now that the various types of abuse has been defined, it now behooves the reader to realize the various facts which are associated with domestic violence. However, one must realize that by its very nature, domestic violence in all of its various forms, will usually remain underreported.However, these are some of the established and published statistics which are available to the public. In 2001, there occurred in the fall in States, 588,420 incidents of intimate partner violence (FBI 2004 pg. 15) Those incidents cost the United States between trey and five billion dollars on medical expenses and an additional 90 meg dollars is lost to businesses as the victims of domestic violence are therefore compelled to recede work out of a medical necessity or from the embarrassment that often times is associated with being a victim of intimate partner abuse.In the United States, 35% of cherry crimes against women, occurred as a result of their intimate partners abuse w ithin the home in 2003. ( FBI 2004 pg. 117) This is a stark comparison to the fact than less than 3$ of violence towards men occur as a result of their intimate partner as well. This latter figure and the fact that our society does not take seriously the occurrence of violence towards males, the reported 3% is only a ballpark estimate and there is no way of knowing barely what percentage of men are being victimized by their intimate partner within the home.23% of men of men who live with their homo partner, experience physical violence. 3. 2 meg men experience tyke abuse such as pushing, shoving and slapping from their intimidate partner. Nearly ? a million men are stalked annually and it has been reported that at least 22% of men have experienced some form of physical, emotional or sexual abuse in their lifetime from an intimate partner during their lifetime. (Cook 2003 pg.118) except for the above mentioned, there seems to be a shortage on the information about men as being th e victims of abuse of various kinds. This will continue until the stigma is completely erased and men feel an absence seizure of guilt and embarrassment from being the victims of such crimes. The embarrassment comes from the fact that society perceives men as being stronger than women and therefore, it is of all time possible to fend stumble the attacker. In this erroneous assumption, one believes that the only form of abuse is physical.If that were the case, then society would be correct a majority of the time as men usually are stronger than women but this does not exclude a woman from using a weapon of any kind in which to overcome the difference in physical strength. Over 70% of men who were victims of physical abuse by their wives or girlfriends, were used on them, some sort of object which was then used as a weapon. However, often times, abuse does not take the form of physical violence and as it was seen in the case of the Jacobs, emotional abuse can for some pack be more d amaging than any form of financial or physical abuse.A man who is torn down every daylight for not fulfilling the expectations of his wife or girlfriend, who is made to feel as though he is not good enough and undeserving of her, who feels inferior in comparison to not only her, but as a man himself, will likely react in a wide arrange of different ways in which he seeks to regain control of the power which he felt he formerly had or as he feels emasculated by the entire process, the man now seeks to gain any sort of dominance over the perpetrator and in the process often times, is transformed from the victim to the perpetrator and physical violence will many times follow.Also, when there first is psychological violence, physical violence will likely follow. As it was touched on previously, the causes of domestic violence revolves more or less the fact that the victim, each intentionally or unintentionally is challenging the power and control of the perpetrator who is committin g these various forms of abuse upon the victim. The need to control their victims also surrounds feelings of lose self esteem and the belief in the inadequacy of the person and that through the control of the victim, the gap which exists in their self esteem can somehow be corrected.Also, the more that these efforts fail to fill that gap within their self esteem, often times, the abuse will intensify. (Cook, 2003 pg. 134) However, there are other causes of abuse and often times, it is the childhood environment in which the perpetrator was bow to and which predisposed him or her to abusing a loved one in the future.A man is six times more likely to abuse a loved one if he was abused himself. A man is septenary times more likely to abuse his loved one if he came from a broken home where the parents got divorced after a extended period of fighting and four times more likely to lack the emotional capacity to abstain from any aspect of the various abuses, if the person came from a br oken home in which only one parent had always been present. (Roberts, 2003 pg.190) Also, if a boy grows up in a family where his become routinely mistreated his wife, then when that boy grows up to become a man, as the sociologists all say that individuals are products of their environment more than then biology, it can sometimes become a certainty that the boy will grow up to repeat what he had spent his life witnessing. (Jones, 2001 pg. 113) union abuse, mental illness and a low self esteem are among some of the various motivating factors which are somewhat to blame for a perpetrators likelihood to commit violence towards an intimate partner.What can be agreed upon, is the fact that intimate partner abuse can be the result of one chief motivating factor or is the result of various factors and all to a varying degree. This is what contributes to the complexity of the problem and the fact that marriage abuse, in all of its various forms, will not be eradicated from the social sc ene any time soon. some other cause of spousal abuse comes from the ability or desire of the man to underestimate the woman for a wide range of reasons.This relates to the overwhelming percentage of spousal abuse in which the woman is the victim of the aggressive and hurtful sort of the man. This is called dehumanization or the reduction of the other person to the importance of aught at all less than an object. Something that id disposable and therefore can be replaced and is of little importance. Only when the perpetrator values the victim as not only a person, not only an individual but one that is of a great value and cannot be replaced will the occurrences of abuse either stop of be curtailed. (Cook, 2003 pg.210) This also speaks to the gender differences of abuse. This is certainly not always the case but mens abuse is preceded by physical violence and women are more cognize for psychological violence. However, an important emersion to recognize is the fact that often ti mes, physical abuse so preceded by psychological abuse and as a result, hospital records report a higher percentage of females seeking treatment than men for spousal abuse. Another factor in the high rate of physical abuse of women in comparison to men is the idea that women, had a predisposition towards being the victims of violence.In Erin Pizzeys controversial book on abuse of women, Prone to craze, Pizzey who was the founding father of a womens shelter in England stated that some women had a predisposition towards being the victim of abuses since they were seeking out the bad boys the ones who were known to act out against society and therefore had within them a sense of danger which some of the women would find exciting. In the same book, Pizzey stated that of the first 100 female victims of spousal abuse, 62 were in her opinion, more violent than the men that they were running away from.Her book does not state if she feeling that these women were instead made to act out viol ently because of the experiences that were placed upon them by their abusing spouses. These findings, no doubt, were the cause of a controversial discussion as to what was the cause of spousal abuse. Nowhere did Ms. Pizzey blatantly state that it was the fault of the women for being abused as it is not the fault of women who enter a bar wearing away provocative clothing and gets raped. What is similar is that women, according to Ms.Pizzey, possess the power to many times, prevent the abuse from occurring by responsible behavior. This is not to say that women are to blame for the abuse since there does not seem to be any legitimate cause for the abuse of anyone, regardless of their gender, age or relation to the perpetrator. What next must follow is that the law will become involved. This is done reluctantly as the judicial system wishes to stay out of such affairs. This changes however, when one or more of the many crimes which are associated with spousal abuse, are deemed to have occurred or is about to occur.This includes but is not limited to murder, manslaughter, rape, threats to kill, kidnapping, nonsensical imprisonment, obstruction of justice and criminal damage as well as harassment and blackmail. When the above mentioned is present with a spousal abuse case, often times it is designed to create or maintain control over another person or the overreaction that the victim had towards the abuse of the perpetrator. In any event, the initial presence of the abuse increases into more than just a orphic family dispute.Often times, the presence of police and the judicial system often times will compound the problem. In a recent issue of the video recording show COPS, an individuals common law wife called the police as she has become the victim of physical abuse by her husband. The cops responded to the call and tried to talk rationally to the man. The presence of the cops enraged the man and as he was being tackled to the floor, yelled that he was going to kill his wife and that he would never forgive her for what SHE had done.The police stated over and over, once the man was subdued, that they had not intention of arresting the man, despite the fact that it was obvious that the man had caused physical harm to both their home and to the woman but she was not going to press charges, the man was not going to be arrested until he decided to assault the police. Not only was the feelings of the man hurt and he was now more enraged by what he perceived to be the incorrect actions of his wife, the court case which followed, only prolonged the negative feelings that the man had towards his wife.Also, both the family disturbance and the court trial that was to follow, occurred in earlier of their small child. It seems unlikely that all three people will take the air away from this event totally unaffected. The negative effects may last for decades to come in all three individuals. This speaks volumes as to the lasting dangers that domestic violence has on those who are involved and those who witness it. In an deification world, everyone would find that one person that they were meant to spend the rest of their lives together in heavenly bliss.This still occurs but those are the lucky ones. Nearly every one of the millions of couples which have gotten divorced in America, either one or both of the people involved, were victims of one form of abuse or another. This is one of the leading reasons why divorce so severely scars the parents as well as the children involved as such abuse does not disappear quickly. Therefore, it would behoove all those involved, to abstain from such abuse on others, especially their loved ones and in front of their children.This is easier said than done for most people but if those who have a disposition towards either being the victim or perpetrator of physical violence, can recognize both the causes and effects of this most dangerous and harmful abuse, they can therefore be wedded much mo re of a chance to avoid its pitfalls and to enjoy the pleasure of a mutually loving relationship free from physical, emotional, economic and spiritual abuse which plagues the happiness of millions of people in this country and around the world. plant CITEDCook. P (2003) Abused Men The Hidden Side of Domestic Violence Westport, CT Praeger Publishers Jones, A ( 2001 ) More Than Victims Battered Women, the Syndrome Society, and the Law (Morality and Society serial Chicago University of Chicago Press. Pearson, D. Man and Daughter are Killed in tragic Plane Crash. Chicago Tribune October 14, 2006 Roberts. A ( 2002) Handbook of Domestic Violence preventive Strategies Policies, Programs, and Legal Remedies New York Oxford University Press Uniform Crime Reports Crime in the U. S. , 2004 (Uniform Crime Reports Crime in the U. S. ) Federal Bureau of Investigation capital of the United States D. C Government Printing Office

Environmental Effects of Vegetarianism Essay

The argona is currently in crisis. The consequences of mans actions had began to resurface as the purlieu becomes seriously threatened. Global warming is the immediate concern, as the domain continues to warm up and antecedent severe changes in climate. There atomic number 18 also otherwise environsal issues to be spoken of the assertable scarcity of bring and wet, deforestation, pollution and the like. The awareness of these problems have prompted many individuals to do their divorce this includes using alternative energy and hybrid cars.However, it seems that the high hat way to dish out the environment move be d nonpareil through the modification of ones diet. Apparently, the consumption of join does much pervert to the environment than vegetarianism. This look for paper aims to discuss the environmental implications of sensual horticulture, such as aggrandizement animals like cattle, as opposed to festering soybeans. According to the coupled Nations, Th e broth sector emerges as one of the top two or trio most portentous contri plainlyors to the most serious environmental problems, at either scale from local to global (qtd.in Freston 1). Raising cattle is vocalism of this sector, on with chickens and pigs (Freston 1). From the statement given by the United Nations, it is affirmed that hence magnetic core production has many environmental repercussions. So how is raising cattle, or animal horticulture in general, bad to the environment? To begin with, animal agriculture utilizes large bowls of land. According to the Keith Akers of the Vegetarian caller of Colorado (VSC). in the United States over 90% of all agricultural land is apply for blood line agriculture. In a global scale, of all the agricultural areas throughout the world, somewhat 69% is used to as pasture (Ethical Vegetarian Alternative EVA). Therefore, a authoritative percentage of all the Earths surface is used for the suggest of breeding animals for me at consumption (EVA). The demand of land that comes with animal agriculture also results in deforestation (EVA). Because meat production requires more land area, forests have to be reborn as agricultural areas. The forests are converted into agricultural land through a slash and have a fit proficiency which damages the forest (Freston).These forests are know to absorb the carbon copy dioxide from the atmosphere, precisely when the trees are burnt, the intent carbon dioxide leave alone be released back in the air. The join of carbon dioxide released through the slash and burn technique outweighs the discharge from fossil fuels (Freston). The rain forests transformed into animal agricultural areas also experiences a decrease in the quality of the estate (EVA). Due to the slash and burn method, the nutrients in the soil impart howevertually be lost and rather of grass, weeds will grow. Regeneration may prove difficult, while fertilizers crowd out only serve as an initial r emedy.Because of deforestation, half of all the virago meadows have been rendered infertile (EVA). Rain forests are finished to prevail more cattle for grazing (EVA Akers). It is said that the area of land damaged for this usage is of the same size of it as seven football fields ( core group). From the year 1950, millions of hectares of forest land had vanished (EVA). In China, pine forests have been destroyed to accommodate animals and their crop food ( inwardness). However, the most distinguished damage of rain forests grass be shew in South the States and Central America (EVA).In Brazil alone, land areas equal to the size of 5,000 soccer fields are disappearing at a effortless rate. Again, this is because of deforestation to accommodate cattle grazing. As for Central America, the number of awe had increased just as the area for pasture had expanded from 1950 to 1995 (EVA). It is in that locationof no surprise that the prices for wood products had increased all over the world (Akers). It is merely the result of the growing demand of commodities from a resource that is behind running out due to deforestation (Akers).Other environmental effect of animal agriculture are soil erosion and desertification (EVA). Animal agriculture is again answerable for soil erosion, which is directly caused by overgrazing of broth ( meaning). Over the last couple of years, numerous mouths and hooves have changed the landscape in more ways than man-made infrastructure such as freeways and striptease mines ever did. Grazing per se is non harmful to the environment. In fact, it even has a positive effect on the landscape. However, overgrazing can cause intensive erosion which can turn meadows into deserts (EVA).Cattle consumes a significant percentage of the vegetation in doing so, the soil is damaged because of weight of the cattle. This, a ample with other factors to consider, enable erosion to occur in which the surface soil is removed. The topsoil is the most fertile layer which was made from rocks and created in a coarse period of time. It takes many years for the topsoil to be created again. Due to livestock grazing and crop production for livestock, a significant amount of topsoil is lost annually (VSC). As a result of immense soil erosion, many lands all over the globe is currently undergoing desertification (EVA).Pastures from all over the world have been extremely eroded, which threatens the mensuration of existing agricultural land. This posits a problem in a time when the population is continuously growing and food supplies are decreasing (EVA). Animal agriculture also causes the glasshouse effect, which in turn results in global warming (EVA). Gases, which are known as glasshouse gases, retain all the heat the terra firma accepts from the sunbathe and sends it back to the atmosphere. This is essentially a natural occurrence. However, when the atmospheric levels of those gases increase, the heat will be trapped and the ear th will warm up.The high temperature of the earth has negative effects in water levels, ecosystems, agriculture, and most specially, the climate (EVA). quaternity gases is known to open to global warming (EVA). Carbon dioxide is the primary greenhouse gas other gases include methane, halogenic compounds and nitrogen oxide (EVA). Animal agriculture is responsible for most of the greenhouse emissions this is because cows, among other animals, release methane in the air (EVA Akers). Methane is derived from ruminants, such as buffaloes, goats, sheep and of course cows when they digest their food.Also, animal spread out contribute to global warming as well (EVA). According to the Food and floriculture Organization, 16% of global methane emissions come from animal agriculture (qtd. in EVA). other(prenominal) environmental hazard that animal agriculture presents is eutrophication (EVA). It is characterized by the extravagant amount of gases such as potassium, nitrogen and phosphur i n the environment as a result, ecosystems are affected. It posits a danger to biodiversity, water sources, and even soil development. The bloom of youth source of eutrophication is animal manure.Manure has metals in it, such as coat and copper these metals are added to fodder to enhance growth. The aforementioned elements are consequently transferred to land through manure, but it can also end up through residue in food intended for servicemans (EVA). Generally, animal manure is not harmful to the environment (EVA). It can rattling used as fertilizers for the soil. However, at present, there is an excess of animal manure that it already presents a dilemma worldwide. Millions of kilograms of manure is created annually, but the space available cannot accommodate that excessive quantity.In Belgium, every kilogram of pork is equal to 16 kilograms of manure. That amount means that dozens of both nitrogen and phosphor are released on Belgian soil every year. Such excess cannot be ab sorbed by the soil, making the heavy metal level in the unpolished particularly high (EVA). Europe is not the only place in the world dealing with such problem. The global pig and poultry industries creates millions of tons of nitrogen yearly (EVA). In the United States, the manure produced by animals devolve that of people.According to the United States Department of Agriculture, 200 milk-cows create the same quantity of nitrates found in the village sewers which is occupied by 5,000 to 10, 000 citizens (qtd. in EVA). Consequently, 22, 000 hens can produce manure which releases an amount of phosphor equal to the manure of 6,000 individuals (EVA). Yet another environmental hazard that is caused by animal agriculture is acidification (EVA). It is caused by excessive amounts of sulfur and nitrogen in land, water, and the atmosphere. Acidification threatens ecosystems trees die, forests struggle to survive and the quality of plants decreases.Lakes and other bodies of water suffer fro m this phenomena as well, posing danger to fishes and polluting the water sources. Acidification is best distinguished through acid rain (EVA). Again, animal agriculture plays a crucial part in acidification (EVA). It is the primary cause for such phenomena. So how does raising animals for food cause acid rain? Animal manure emits high levels of ammonia in the atmosphere. Two main contributors of ammonia are cows and pigs. Both animals produce 97% of all the ammonia in the atmosphere. Excessive amounts of ammonia is detrimental to the environment, as it is extremely toxic.Organisms such as reptiles, butterflies, even lichens are threatened by this compound (EVA). Ammonia is derived from the nitrates found in animal manure (EVA). The compound is mostly emitted to the atmosphere, but it can also affect both soil and water. This presents a danger to the human population, as the potable water supply may be dirty with ammonia. Humans are not the only ones threatened by possible contamin ation. The fish population is also at risk, as the phosphates and nitrates can clog up and decrease the quality of their habitat.Hence, manure derived from animal agriculture is responsible for acidification and water pollution due to the compounds found in the manure. If meat consumption is reduced, the methane will also be reduced as it only stays in the atmosphere for about ten years (Freston 2). This reduction will cause the planet to cool (Freston 2). Not only does animal agriculture stain the waters, it also uses large amounts of it (EVA). In fact, it is the main consumer of sweet water. urine is actually used and abused by the meat constancy (Akers). The consumption begins with lacrimation the fodder crops (EVA Meat).It is followed by the large amounts of water that animals need to drink. and so there is the need for water to maintain the factory farms, the trucks that transport the meat as well as the slaughterhouses (Meat). However, much water, approximately 80%, is a lso apply for the creation of meat products (Akers EVA). Meat processing also consumes too much water. In fact, for a single pound of meat to be produced, 5,000 gallons of water is used. Such great amount of water for such a small piece of meat is proof that the meat industry is wasting such a valuable resource.Compared to meat production, how does vegetarianism affect the environment? In essence, vegetarianism actually does not present any harm to the environment in fact, it positively affects it. Vegetarianism works in this formula Land + Water = Crops (Rutherford). There is limited land to be used, just as there is a limited water supply (Rutherford). A small area of land and a ample amount of water could produce a decent amount of crops. Planting of crops can be done in a small farmland this endeavor does not need extensive territories for production, unlike meat consumption.The water to be used is also not wasted, as it will only be utilized to water the crops. In fact, 1 kil ogram of meat uses 100 times the amount of water needed for 1 kilogram of vegetables (EVA). Hence, with limited resources, vegetarianism can be free burning and not endanger the environment. Not only does vegetarianism consider the limitations of natural resources but also it does not add waste that could be detrimental to ecosystems. In addition, the vegetarian lifestyle can actually help the environment. The crops will absorb the carbon dioxide from the atmosphere and turns in into oxygen (Rutherford).Animal agriculture presents more disadvantages in the environment than vegetarianism. To begin with, meat production consumes limited resources that could be utilized for other endeavors. It also releases harmful elements and compounds in the air, soil and water. In the long run, the environment will suffer if this is continued. Therefore, compared to vegetarianism, animal agriculture is more detrimental to the environment.Works CitedAkers, Keith. The Most Important Thing You Can Do For the Environment. Vegetarian Society of Colorado. 14 May 2008 . Freston, Kathy. Vegetarian is the New Prius. Alternet. org. 7 Feb. 2007. 14 May 2008 . Meat and the Environment. Goveg. com. 14 May 2008 . Rutherford, Timothy. Logical Environmental Reasoning for a Vegetarian Lifestyle. Enviroveggie. com. 14 May 2008 . Vegetarianism and the Environment. Ethical Vegetarian Alternative. 14 May 2008 .