Utilitarianism vs. Kantianism Essay -- Papers Immanuel Kant Ethics Mor

Utilitarianism vs. KantianismEthics quarter be defined as the conscious reflection on our moral beliefs with the aim of improving, extending or civilisation those beliefs in some way. (Dodds, stir 2) Kantian moral possible action and Utilitarianism atomic number 18 two theories that attempt to answer the estimable nature of human beings. This idea will attempt to explain how and why Kantian moral supposition and Utilitarianism differ as well as discuss why I believe Kants theory provides a more credible account of ethics. Immanuel Kants deonotological ethical theory assesses if actions are moral ground on the soulfulnesss will or intention of acting. Kants theory can be categorized as a deonotological because actions are not assessed to be morally permissible on the background of consequences they produce, but rather on the form of the agents will in acting, (Dodds, Lecture 7) therefore his actions are based on duty and not consequential. Kantianism is based on three conventions maxims, willing, and the categorical imperative. Kant states that a maxim is a world(a) rule or principle which will explain what a person takes himself to be doing and the circumstances in which he takes himself to be doing it (Feldman, 1999, 201). It is important that this principle be universalisable and that the maxim can be applied consistently to everyone that encounters standardised situations, therefore willed as a universal law. The second aspect of Kants theory is willing. This involves the agent consistently committing oneself to make an action occur. He states that, In general, we can say that a person wills inconsistently if he wills that p be the case and he wills that q be the case and its impossible for p and q to be the case together (Feldman, 1999, 203). T... ...nces. Kantianism focuses on the motivation of actions, has clear and distinct launch of universal rules, and is morally logical. On the other hand, Utilitarianism relies on the conseq uences of an action, has no array universal laws as each action is assessed on an individual basis, and devotion is based on the results of the assessment. Because of these reasons, I believe that Kantianism is the more ethically plausible theory of the two. BibliographySusan Dodds, Lecture 2 notes, Utilitarianism.Susan Dodds, Lecture 7 notes, Kantianism.Fred Feldman, Kants Ethics guess Exposition and Critique from H. J. Curzer, ed Ethical Theory and Moral Problems, Belmont, Ca Wadsworth publication Co. 1999.J.S. Mill, What Utilitarianism Is from Peter Y. Windt, An Introduction to Philosophy Ideas in Conflict, St Paul, MN West Publishing, 1982.