Occupiers Liability Essay examples -- Papers

Occupiers Liability Objective The objective of this document is to outline the obligations of the RSPB, as occupier of property. The obligations are set out in two Occupiers Liability Acts 1957 and 1984, and are owed to persons who enter RSPB property either as licensed visitors, or as unlicensed interlopers. The document does not purport to cover every contingent situation and those in any doubt should consult Legal and conformism as to secure their own position. Overview The RSPB owns large quantities of real estate, including many mankind reserves. It also owns many offices to which employees have access. As Occupier, the RSPB owes a duty of get by to any persons who use RSPB land, irrespective of authorisation. Legal Analysis RSPB is the Occupier for the purposes of both(prenominal) the Occupiers Liability Act 1957 and Occupiers Liability Act 1984. This is because the RSPB as an organisation has fast supervision and control and the pow er of permitting or prohibiting the entry of persons onto its land. Thus, the Law imposes equitable liability upon the RSPB for its defective premises and death or personal dent (and loss to property) that incurred by persons upon its land This responsibility upon the RSPB to secure the welfare of persons upon its land, is affect by the status of such persons. Indeed, the duty owed to lawful visitors is of a higher(prenominal) standard than the duty owed to unlawful trespassers. However, in accordance with the law, reasonable measures need to be taken to secure the welfare of both groups. The Duty of Care owed to square Visitors Section 2 (2) of the Occupiers Lia... ...tandard of care owed differentiates. The standard for an invited person is higher as the RSPB undertakes to secure his welfare, the standard for a trespasser is objective and thus lower, as the trespasser is deemed to be an average person, and no regard is given to the idiosyncrasies of the trespasser age, mental health. Evaluation The RSPB must take all reasonable measures to keep in line its grounds are reasonably safe and that any disclaimers of safety cleft greater protection to the visitor rather than just highlighting the risk. However, for trespassers, at that place must still be no overtly dangerous objects/ bunch upon RSPB property, though regard need not be given to particular characteristics of trespassers. Moreover, disclaimers ought to warn of the dangers but not necessarily offer any alternatives.