Peer-Reviewed Literature Versus Popular Press Essay

The purpose of peer-reviewed belles-lettres is to exemplify original reports, research, or reviews, and evaluate the material that scholars study already published (Scholarly Vs Popular Press, 2005). Peer review refers to a act that screens the writings of scholars before they base be published. Review panels, comprising other scholars and researchers, atomic number 18 responsible for evaluating the already published material with respect to its significance in addition to methodology.Although the published research finds may or may not be true, peer-reviewed literature is generally considered authoritative evidence for a produce which is validated once the research has been analyzed in depth and its findings have been applied as well as reexamined in a cast of contexts or by the use of different theoretical models (Peer-reviewed literature). lee(prenominal) Shulman, the President of the Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching, explains that the essentiality of s cholarly literature is that it can be cited, refuted, built upon, and shared (Peer-reviewed literature). Hence, peer-reviewed literature is considered more reliable than touristy press, the purpose of which may be simply to present articles that entertain, inform, or grocery goods and services. Popular press may contain literature on up-to-date events or myriad popular interests (Scholarly).Given that the articles published in the popular press are not peer-reviewed, they may or may not be reliable. They are definitely not considered scholarly, seeing that they cannot be refuted. According to a scientific study, popular press coverage of a health problem known as the chronic fatigue syndrome has enlarged and even distorted the divisions within the research community on the defeat of the chronic fatigue syndrome (MacLean & Wessely, 1994). It is clear, therefore, that popular press cannot be trusted to present valid information.