Language Games, Writing Games - Wittgenstein and Derrida: A Comparative Study :: Philosophy Philosophical Papers

Language Games, Writing Games - Wittgenstein and Derrida A relative StudyABSTRACT The concept of deconstructionism was first used by Derrida in transforming Heideggerian destruction. The deconstruction of Derrida is a textintern, intertextual, in-textual activity. He plays a double peppy inside of philosophic system, emphasizing that our thinking is embedded in metaphysics, while at the same moment he questions metaphysics. Wittgensteins deconstruction, however, involves a new kind of reading, a Zerzettelung of the traditionally argumentative and linear thinking modes. The hazard plays an important break in both philosophers texts. I would the like to investigate this role and function under the two following viewpoints. First, I think that the game has a strategic role. Second, both philosophers stress that their game is not a founded game but is bounded to knowledge and forms of knowledge. Wittgenstein and Derrida are two spurs, perons of philosophical thinking, who changed the environment of philosophical discourses. They practice new arts of thinking and writing, which lead to a change of paradigm and of style in philosophy. In the case of novel Wittgenstein the change manifests in a critical attitude toward modern consistent discourses. The annonced silence (Stille) of the Tractatus transfigures itself through textual dispersions into the styles (Stile) of the late Wittgenstein. By Derrida we can study this paradigm change in his critique of philosophical logo-phono-ethnocentrism and even more(prenominal) in his way of writing, wich through its disseminating force overpasses the bar between philosophy and literature. Alluding to the historical perspectives of these relationships Rorty remarked (Rorty 1984, 5) that as Derrida treats the philosophy of Heidegger, in the similar way case-hardened Heidegger the philosophy of Nietzsche. Derrida is in the same position to Heidegger and Heidegger to Nietzsche as Wittgenstein is to Russell and Russell to Mill. It would be interest to analyze paralelly the Mill-Russell-Wittgenstein line to the Nietzsche-Heidegger-Derrida line or to investigate the Mill-Nietzsche, Russell-Heidegger and Wittgenstein-Derrida couples. I would like to focus in my paper on three aspects of the Wittgenstein-Derrida relationship the philosophical attitudes, the writing and reading activity and the language games and writing games.1. Philosophy as deconstructive activityThe concept of deconstruction would be used the first meter by Derrida, transforming Heideggerian destruction, but we can suppose, that the activity meant by deconstruction would be practiced also by others, by earlier philosophers. Derrida himself notes that there are at least three proto-deconstructors - Nietzsche, Freud and Heidegger, but the deconstructive activity is as old as the philosophy.