Is Mankind Harming the Environment? Essay

This paper exit discuss whether military personnel has played a exercise in harming the environment. It will talk in detail to the highest degree the various hu homophile activities that ca-ca had an impact on our indispensable home ground and will also give specific examples of what we should expect in the succeeding(a) as a result of our activities and how we should deal with them. Mankind has several indispensable resources at his disposal. These include the oceans, atmosphere, forests etc. Any misuse or utilize of these resources will eventually destroy the sustainability of these resources.The fish population whitethorn sour extinct, climate changes may result in an make up in natural disasters, forests may not be replaceable etc. In short, pace or improper use of the environmental resources may result in long term consequences for the entire mankind. (Ostrom, Elinor et al 2002) There is significant separate to prove that mankind has indeed played a major role in harming the environment. Most the earths fisheries dedicate already been done for(p) and the Amazon rain forest is also near destruction. clements have destroyed more than 30 per cent of the natural world since 1970 with in effect(p) depletion of the forest, freshwater and marine systems on which life depend. (Guardian 1998) This combined with the persistent amplification in babys room gas firings have resulted in a colossal increase in ozone layer depletion and orbicular warm. This in turn has resulted in climate change all over the world causing an increase in the frequency of floods, droughts, hurricanes, extr despatchies of weather, coastal erosion, melting glaciers etc.No doubtfulness global warming is the result of mans own activities. gentlemans gentleman activities which produce increasing amounts of greenhouse gases especially carbon dioxide from burning dodo fuel are causing global warming all crosswise the world. Global warming has even caused the sea level to rise in the midst of four and eight inches during the last hundred divisions and every year seal level now rises one tenth of an inch. If mankind continues to emit greenhouse gases at the same rate it will result in serious environmental degradation as well as contradict effects on human health.(Mank, Bradford 2005) As Athanasiou and Baer put it, Even if we track down quickly to cap the emission of greenhouse pollutants a politically and diplomatically unrealistic scenario at present, the consequences of global warming will soon become rather severe, and even murderous, particularly for the poor and the vulnerable. And in the more likely effect where we move slowly, the impacts will verge on catastrophic. Maximum contribution towards environmental degradation comes from industrialized countries as about one-half of all greenhouse gas emissions come from these regions.For example the United States produces about one absorb of the worlds greenhouse gases. (Harris, Paul 20 03) Climatologists suggest that average temperatures globally are expected to increase between three and ten degrees Fahrenheit(postnominal) by the next century. They also predict that climate change will also cause new problems because of a persistent degradation of our ecosystem. revolt sea levels, severe natural disasters such as hurricanes, drought, floods, air pollution, propagate of diseases like malaria and cholera and other environmental disasters are all prohibit consequences of global warming.(Smith, Daniel S. 2001) Some scientists have even predicted that human activities and increasing greenhouse gases will make the Earth so warm that the inhabitants will be unable to adapt to the changing climate. The predicted results of this warming include melting of the wintry ice caps, flooding of coastal cities, massive extinction of species, and the deterioration of elegance as we know it. (Parsons, Michael L. 1995) Increasing globalisation and mans appetency to accumula te more and more profit has also played a major role in harming the environment.Increased use of energy has resulted in a widespread increase in greenhouse gas emission from fossil fuel use and this has resulted in an increase in global warming. If humans dont take any action, global warming will continue to increase. The Environmental Protection Agency estimates that basic changes in personal outlay, mostly in the realms of electricity use, climate control, and transportation, can slim the average Americans carbon emissions by roughly one-third, from 15,000 to 10,000 pounds per year. advance reductions can be achieved through changing consumption patterns of food and consumer goods, uncomplete of which is included in those calculations. If combined with more efficient technology, this sort of realignment of priorities would intimately reduce the threat of global warming, as well as physical body of other environmental problems. (Smith, Daniel S. 2001) Mankinds level of water consumption is also constantly on the rise and it is predicted that water shortage may become mankinds biggest problem in the twenty counterbalance century.It is estimated that up two thirds of the worlds countries will face keep to high water shortages by 2025. This accompanied with increasing air, water and molder pollution due to extensive industrial development has further deteriorated our environment. greater use of fossil fuel and biomass burning and land clearing have led to a increase in nitrogen that has in turn, small the absorptive capacity of natural system.While the above evidence demonstrates mankinds contribution to environmental deterioration, there are supporters who insist that man has played such a negative role. They feel that there hasnt been such a major impact on the environment to take off with and that the consequences have been exaggerated to a large extent. Those who support globalization and recall its negative impact on the environment feel that e conomic reach is closely linked to environmental performance but in a positive manner.They feel that it is in fact economic prosperity that may lead to a cleaner environment. The logic behind this argument is that by adopting new and improved technologies, industries will have a less libellous impact on the environment and economic progress would enable countries to beat changes into their mode of operation and save the environment from harm. (John, Detlef).On the other make it a report by by the Working Group on Development and Environment in the Americas (U.S, Mexico, Brazil, Argentina, Chile, Costa Rica and El-Salvador) shows that industrial development and globalization has caused severe damage to the environment and highlights that the Americas now have growing problems with air, state and water contamination as a result of globalization, urbanization and modernization. (Schalatek, Liane 2004) Human activities have destroyed our natural habitat, have resulted in accelerati ng global warming and have contributed to air and water pollution.The amount of greenhouse gases being emitted straight off is sufficient to cause considerable damage to the environment. The ozone layer is being depressed continuously, a number of pesticides and other organic pollutants have been spread globally endangering hormonal balances and the immune system in man and animals. Increasing dependency on natural resources has resulted in a rapid depletion of tropical forests and fisheries. numerous regions are facing problems of water shortage, resource depletion, climate change risks from biological agents etc. (Dahl, Lynn 1998) There has been a decline in plants, animals, insects and birds. According to the UN, the certain extinction rate is up to 1000 times faster than in the past. It is estimated that around 844 animals and plants have disappeared in the last 500 years. The global guide for biological resources now exceeds the planets capacity to renew them by 20%. (Adam , David 2006).