Fanon and de Beauvoir: Opposing Discrimination Essay example -- Psycho

Fanon and de Beauvoir Opposing DiscriminationAll young (i.e. post-paleolithic) religions contain the Gnostic trace of distrust or even outright hostility to the body and the created orbit. Contemporary primitive tribes and even peasant-pagans have a concept of immortality and of going-outside-the-body (ec-stasy) without necessarily exhibiting any excessive body-hatred. The Gnostic Trace accumulates rattling gradu all toldy (like mercury poisoning) till eventually it turns pathological. Gnostic dualism exemplifies the extreme purview of this disgust by shifting all value from body to savour. This idea characterizes what we call civilization.-Hakim Bey, Information War, c-theory a022Struggles against injustice in the 20th century tend to take a drearily akin(predicate) form. First the advocate recognizes that not all flock are equal, contiguous demands that round irrelevant differences are ignored, and finally tries to make all people people again. This method has become so popular it has been applied all the way down the ladder of inferiority, to declare politically-irrelevant unequal treatment on every possible basis. The effort is, in a sense, a shoot to move from the created world outside the body to a cheery world of equality in the mind. This hostility to the body and exoneration of a ecumenical landing field, unfortunately, is also precisely the basic cause of the discrimination one moldiness condemn in step one of struggles for equality. The subject is a occupation for many reasons, but the explicit proclamation of the inferiority of some to others relies stringently on an ability to say what a person is or should be, and what not. If some are treated as less than human, it whitethorn well be because of the category of human itself.... ...attempt to initiate some oppressed groups into the class of oppressors. What may well be needed instead of trading places in the scheme of constructed identities centered around one ideal subject i s a rethinking of the subject itself, a problematization of the role of self that Fanon and de Beauvoir are so anxious to elaborate just enough to allow in their chosen group. The analogy to Moses is apt, the Gnostic impulse here can be seen in both thinkers as they rescue their people from the servitude in one land, take them through a long initiation process to the promised land, which is disappointing, and then allow them free harness as stable subjects to wage war against their own enemies and dominate the Canaanites as they had been dominated. There is a perverse specter of the golden rule organism obeyed discriminate against others as you were once discriminated against.