Brand management. Dove Essay

1) wherefore does Unilever want fewer nocks?First of all lets gear up what we mean does blade mean? I turnk brand is the practical, excited, or instinctual response that is stimulated in the brain by a harvest-time or participation. Brand is the visualise and discovering that get to people minds and police wagon when they hear, smell, see and think of your get word, increase, and benefit. A brand may identify cardinal item, a family of items, or all items of that seller. If employ for the firm as a safe and sound, the preferred term is trade name. Unilever wants fewer brands because it takes time, energy and resources to manage to individually one brand. The more brands you brandish, the more resources you expend. In addition, brands compete with other brands for mental accepted estate in the customers mind. So, Unilever needs to take up fewer brands, hardly these brands have to be stronger. Also, Global decentralization brought problems of go for to the company and its portfolio had grown is a relatively laissez-faire manner and that prevails Unilever has lacked of global identity.2) What was plunges foodstuff status in the 1950s? What is its stance in 2007? In the 1950s, descends position was a functionally superior cleanser than gook, touch on on science. Today, go down is transforming into a lifestyle brand, bear on on an emotional connection opi overboldeen consumer/ crossway. In the 1950s squabs locating was ground on the functional superiority of its products and go downs position was a functionally superior cleanser than soap, centered on science. Since the construction for the soap had come from military research conducted to find a non-irritating strip down cleaner with high levels of vivid skin, dove did non call their product soap. The advertisements clearly conveyed that squab was one-quarter cleansing cream and further fortify this incident visually with photographs that showed cream being poured into a tab let. Thus their positioning in the 1950s was just based on conveying the benefits of go down as a moisturizing agent and a cleanser.However, Dove changed its positioning in 2007. A reason for this change was the p arent Unilevers initiative path to Grow. Under this initiative Unilever wanted to reduce the diversity of its brands and operate down the quash of brands from 1600 to 400. Unilever had selected Dove as one of its portfolio of brands that would serve as Masterbrand. Each of these Masterbrands would be an umbrella identity over a draw of product forms. Under this cutting initiative, Dove was transforming into a lifestyle brand, centered on an emotional connection between consumer and product. This meant that Dove is no daylong communicating functional superiority as functionality meant diametrical things in different categories.3) How did Unilever organize to do product category management and brand management in Unilever before 2000? What was the corresponding structure after 2000? How was brand substance keepled before 2000 and how is it controlled at the time of this case? Throughout the years, Dove has unploughed a consistency with their appreciation for natural women. However, their style of messaging has changed. From accenting the functional benefit of a moisture rich cleansing obstacle and having the product sell itself, Ogilvy and Mather advertising agency has created a life full point of confidence for the natural women. They rely on more edgy concepts, though maintaining respect to the product and mission statement. On other word, before 2000, Unilevers brand management strategy was decentralized and apprizenibalistically capitalistic, pushing each brand manager to compete with in-house brands. After 2000, organizationally Dove sought to thin the herd and focus on building super-brands. Prior to 2000, the meaning of Dove was simple and aspirational soap that would not dry your skin. After 2000, Dove used emotional stimulu s to implant the product deep in the customers minds. Dove became a statement of who you are, so one of the sizable differences between indeed and now is the additional availability of options to communicate a branded meat to consumers.4) Spend a little time searching blogs, using Google blog Search, Technorati, BlogRunner, or any other blog search engines, to get a sense of what people are saying about Dove directly. What does this interchange (your blog search) contribute to the meaning of the brand? There is around cast of political or social essence included in their advertisements of the corpo authoritative mantrap effort, which heat up discussions on the Internet. On the blogs, I feel in that respect are mostly negative critics about Dove. However, this is with regard to their advertisements so it means the reactions are about the message included in it, not specifically about the products. In addition, Dove does not include its products in the advertisements o f the campaign.Among the blogs, Dove is perceived as a brand which tries to express what the mean(a) women looks like. Dove emphasizes on true dishful and naturalness, which concerns a true scrap by expressing this in its advertisements. To some people it is appealing while for some others it is not.This comes forth out of believe that the women in the advertisements are not really natural at that place is some distrust among a group of customers when it comes to dark possibility of chuckting on make-up and using Photoshop in the advertisements. This is what the discussions on blogs can result in it can generate distrust as well as trust of the Dove brand among people and/or customers and I want to focus on two factors here forecast building Once I typed the term Dove, thousands of posts come out. No matter the comment is good or bad, the more the posts are. From different bloggers, there are different point of views for this brand which provide consumers a whole scope of a p roduct. And if enunciate comment for a famous blogger, his sluggish comments not only impress consumers but also even pack them into buying Doves products more. Second, Brand identification Besides ingratiatory comments from famous bloggers which make customers devote to it, most discussions are usually customers reviews based on their personal experiences and usually follow a product scalawag or a link connected to purchasing pages.In fact, these manikin of reviews are almost good words, but even though clear-sighted that the reviews are over exaggerated, customers still identify with Dove unconsciously and furthermore purchase instantly. I believe it is hard to know the effect on the sales of the Dove products and it is not clear, the discussions mainly focus on the message of the advertisement campaigns. In the end, the discussions generate favorable and unfavorable arguments for the Dove brand. The ambit of women in advertisements is a sensitive subject among women in t he world. The term beauty captures many different meanings among people and therefore it is a topic, which can organize to endless discussions. Moreover, for Dove this means that it is not perceived as solely a brand for products however, also as a brand which tries to make people aware of the impact of brands and its advertisements in general. Finally, I think they should have focused in both genders or mentioned how males can affect womens decision-making.5) Footnote 1 of the case leads you to a blogger who asks, with reference to the age of YouTube advertising, Is grocery storeing now cheap, fast and out of control? Footnote 2 refers to Dove as having started a conversation that they dont have control of. In When Tush comes to Dove Seth Stevens writes about the uncollectible bet that Dove is making. Do You see risks for the Dove Brand today Summery Dove consider as the worlds number one brand for health and beauty product sector. In the erstwhile(prenominal) it has built it s success on innovating products such as its early tummy bar with moisturizing cream, which was quite a revolution on the soap market at that time. Doves marketing strategy since 1957 and the launch of the kickoff cleansing bar was to communicate on the functional superiority of its product (no dry sensation) over traditional soap. It was a great success that do the brand the leader on this market. But as I read it in the case, Dove became a masterbrand of Unilever in 2000, which started to sale many health and beauty product (deodorants, body pilingions, hair care, etc) under the brand name of Dove. Thats why Dove had to change its advertising strategy. Marketing could no longer base its strategy on the functional superiority of its soap but had to communicate on a wider message.Thats when Dove started with its Campain for real beauty and builds the show of a brand with ideas and point of view on the society. Dove had always preferred natural-looking women for its ads rather t han stereotypical models but each time, it was only to fire the benefits of Dove products. In this campaign, it was the first time they promote controversial message against the common image of womens beauty. They communicated on the natural beauty (provided by Dove products) instead of unreachable and fake beauty that you can see in the majority of advertisement. This controversial marketing campaign had a huge success in terms of media coverage but some people talked about the risks taken by Dove in opening a social debate that they couldnt control and the fact that they might get the image of the fat people brand which could put them in an uncomfortable marketing position. First of all, Dove made this die hard of ads to discuss about the common image of beauty in our society. They were fetching position as they present themselves as the leader of a involvement against non-natural and unreachablebeauty. It is a good way to build the image of a brand that has a point of view an d cares about womens problems beyond the need of the product itself (lack of self-esteem, etc). They made some TV ads that to launch the roll and it worked better than expected as the media started to talk about a new social debate and some TV shows mention it as ethnic phenomenon.Then they posted videos on YouTube. After a quick and king-sized spread on the web, the message took another dimension as bloggers and assemblys users start to talk about it. Thats where the risks has begun. As Doves message was diffused widely, it was getting harder and harder to control the content of it and the image it wanted to promote. I think the only field where it is risky is for the non-potential consumers that can speak in a bad way about the brand and then change the mind of the potential consumers. As is mentioned in the case, both controversial message is dangerous if you can no longer control it. Some voices started to see Dove as the brand for fat women and axiom the no-aspiration aspe ct in Doves advertising. There were a lot of parodies done on the ads and some of them were real critical about Unilever craft and real motives. Though Unilever was very careful about public relations, there was a risk with this campaign of losing the power of delivering a clear image and message.To conclude, I think that if I could find some risks in this strategy, the benefits of it are far more numerous. . I do not consider it risky for Dove to put an advertisement campaign in this way. Because using this new way of distributing their advertisements only enhances the brand awareness and the attachment and loyalty of customers of the Dove brand. Also, They successfully touched many people in a very short time and, above all, besides the first TV and criterion ads, this campaign grew up hugely without costing a thing, which is an amazing payoff and smart act. TV shows and debate, as well as Internet public exposure were doing the work for it. I think their strategy is not a bi g problem for the brands image if we compare it to all Doves sales and financial results.