Scenario Consider Essay Example for Free

Scenario pick up EssayOperant conditioning is based on the premise that doings can be organise and even modified with the aid of consequences. The main defining dissimilarity between operant conditioning and the unstained or Pavlovian conditioning is the fact that it is concerned with change or development of voluntary sort (Kirsch, Lynn, 2004). It is important to note that under operant conditioning the main variable of concern is the environment that is acted upon and is stupor by given variables (Dalla, Shors, 2009).The consequences of the operant therefore play an important parting in ensuring that a behavior that has been developed or modified is maintained. Under operant conditioning reinforcement and punishment are the call factors that determine the direction that behavior will be redirected to. Negative Vs Positive wages a) SimilaritiesThe core parity between positive and negative reinforcement is that they are all aimed at ensuring high relative frequen cy of tooshie behavior The use of a stimulus that is introduced into or removed from the environment under status is some other factor that is shared by the two forms of reinforcement (Wenger, Schmidt, Davisson, 2004). It is important note that the key goal in both forms of reinforcements is to increase the frequency of the expected or observed behavior b) Contrast The key difference between the two modes of reinforcement is the type of stimulus apply.In positive reinforcement the stimulus used is favorable and negative reinforcement employs an aversive stimulus (Myers, 2004). Another notable difference is that in just about cases negative reinforcement involves removal of a stimulus whereas positive reinforcement involves its introduction. Most Effective Reinforcement Positive reinforcement is to a greater extent effective than negative reinforcement. This choice is guided by the fact that reinforcements though included in the operant conditioning set up may in fact authoris e to forced adoption.It is important to note that the key goal in operant conditioning is to regard on the environment and not the organism being observed (Myers, 2004). Thus negative reinforcement which is in intimately cases included in the set up when behavior is being observed and removed once frequency has been heightened may lead to wrong results by impacting on the organism. On the other hand, positive reinforcement is not aimed at avoidance of a negative effect and therefore the behavior observed is likely to be of high level of accuracy.a two year old who is continually holler with minimal provocation. vociferous is behavior and provocation is a stimulus that impacts on this behavior The main aim in this scenario is to land the frequency of his or her outbursts with the introduction of a stimulus and a form of reinforcement. The stimulus under this consideration is to continually tell the child that crying is bad and may attract dangerous animals into their home.This m ay impact on the child perception of crying by affecting his sphere of thought or more accurately the environment. A reinforcement may also be required to increase the frequency with which a child responds positively (does not cry with minimal provocation). Reinforcement Schedule Candies are any childs front-runner and will therefore play an important role in reinforcing behavior It is important to note that candies are not within the environment when a child is provoked and therefore do not impact on behavior rather it is introduced later.After the first lecture, the child is presented with a candy when he resists crying after being slightly provoked. This cycle is continued with no increase or decrease in the number of candies that the child is presented with. It is important to note that the form of reinforcement used under this scenario is positive ascribable to the age of the subject and ethical concerns. Reference Dalla, C. , Shors, T. J. (2009).Sex differences in learning processes of classical and operant conditioning. Physiology Behavior, 97(2), 229-238. Kirsch, I. , Lynn, S. J. (2004). The role of cognition in classical and operant conditioning. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 60(4), 369-392. Myers, D. G. (2004). Exploring Psychology. London Worth Publishers. Wenger, G. R. , Schmidt, C. , Davisson, M. T. (2004). Operant condition in the Ts65Dn Mouse Learning. Behavior Genetics, 34(1), 105-119.